- Explore community
Does anyone particularly like the simple reversal of images in an association.
Just for a notional example, there is an image of a Comma Butterfly on the flower. The Comma is easy in the invertebrates section but then to add the flower in the plants section without further images of the leaves etc.
Is that right ?
I'm not saying it's wrong but sometimes it is very difficult to agree to an identification when there is very little of the flower to go on.
I'd be interested in other people's opinions. At the end of the day it's not a big issue but to some an important one.