fantastic met colours in the twisted cone
No interactions present.
Martin is correct since Balea (Balea) sarsii is now considered the correct name for what was previously called Balea (Balea) heydeni.
Both refer to the same species, but I was out of date with my nomeclature :(
BMIG website: www.bmig.org.uk (centipedes, millipedes & woodlice)
BMIG Newsletters ~ www.bmig.org.uk/view/resource/bmig-newsletter
BMIG Bulletins ~ www.bmig.org.uk/view/resource/bmig-bulletin
Yes, I've come back to this as I have begun a new local monitoring programme.
Do either of you know the value of agreeing to either of both? I ask because the panel is incomplete for sarsii and heydeni is still accepted by a number of authorities. How does iSpot handle conflicting IDs - it sometimers seems blind to names but Likely is triggered or altered by the likes of lowly me (you both have the same power).
Read here - http://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=4247
THREE MARINE PROJECTS
I'll make the same comment that I always make - iSpot's species names come from the species dictionaries that we link to, in this case the UKSI:
At the moment the UKSI still uses Balea heydeni, hence if you type in Balea sarsii no links appear to NBN etc. (and also next time we export iSpot observations to the mollusc recording scheme this one will get missed out if the Likely ID doesn't link to the UKSI).
So my preference is always to stick to the names in the UKSI, even if these are out of date when compared to other sources. But I know that not everyone agrees with me! I've now agreed with Steve's ID as heydeni, which has tipped the balance for the Likely ID back to that name, for now anyway!
Entomologist and biological recorder
from an author of the B. heydeni paper (Richard Preece).
However in use in the UK and Ireland
This is the publication where B.sarsii was used as a prior name for B. heydeni
More information here
Catalogue of Life does not appear to have any Balea species; not even Balea perversa!
But still we are waiting for UKSI to catch up.
You will find that the Natural History Museum, Conch. Soc. etc now use B. sarsii
8:36 AM (9 hours ago)
My understanding is that heydeni von Maltzan 1881 is a junior synonym of sarsii Pfeiffer 1847 (type locality: Norway). Ted von Proschwitz discovered this earlier name.
At 17:29 24/09/2014, you wrote:
I would like to know if you have any recent updates on the heydeni/sarsii naming issue.
UKSI really should be using Balea sarsii
CoL does not have any Balea species! Maybe something is wrong with the current dictionary approach?
I understand that the world of taxonomy/ nomenclature is full of pitfalls, but the case does not seem so
Lat/Lng: 52.9704, -3.168
OS grid ref: SJ216420