No interactions present.
Thanks TimP but I know that it isn't this
I am frankly rather horrified that "Luzula sylvatica" is still shown as the 'likely ID' - this is a bad howler. No criticism of the original suggestion, but it is worrying that it currently has an 'expert' confirmation that in this case is perpetuating the misidentification.
Oh well, anyone looking at the page should be able to see the truth here.
was slightly confused when other Scirpus sylvaticus did not appear at the bottom as i was sure i had added this species before from Clifton near York but will add it later.
Thanks Miked for adding the agreement - it was enough to swing the "Likely ID" to the correct one.
I don't know why, but this one just annoyed me.
Thanks for the identification, this one has puzzled me since 2007
I knew it wasn't Luzula sylvatica so didn't change the title, not particularly common around here
Lat/Lng: 52.1, -3.4
OS grid ref: SO0451