Growing about 1.5 metres up a dead tree.
Caution: Do NOT use iSpot to identify fungi to eat!
Some fungi are very poisonous so a mistaken ID could have serious consequences.
No interactions present.
It might be worth keeping an eye on this if possible. It does not look right for Flammulina which has a sticky cap rather than this velvety one.
I take your point, but what else could it be? There is a photo of a big group of them here: http://www.fungi4schools.org/COVERS/0803.jpg, many of which look a bit like mine (IMHO)..
I think they are probably VS but they also look a bit like emergent Rhodotus palmatus. Never having seen this species I do not know exactly what they look like when so young.
I think F.velutipes can look like this in it's emergent stage of development, which this seems to be. But it would definitely be worth revisiting to check on it's development.
Doubt if I'll be back to Cambridge before the New Year. This mushroom was growing on a dead-looking tree in the Park & Ride car park there. The Dryad's Saddle http://www.ispot.org.uk/node/241161 was on the same poor tree!
It dos seem to fit a newly emerging Rhodotus palmatus,there was one put on by Janet(sorry cannot remember the username) a couple of weeks ago and seems very similar.It does not look right for F.velutipes.
Well I'd love to see a mature Rhodotus palmatus... maybe it will still be there if I'm dragged to Cambridge for the sales in the New Year!
This is Janet's observation... http://www.ispot.org.uk/node/239684
It DOES look a bit like mine though rather damp!
I'll add Rhodotus palmatus as a possible ID...
I have two sites in my local wood that I have been keeping an eye on. The other is http://www.ispot.org.uk/node/238443?nav=users_observations) and they seem to be more - well - peachy coloured than yours and wrinkled from an early age. However we all know how much variability there is within a species.
Certificate in Contemporary Science (Open)
I'd say these were velvet shank and that from my experience they can be velvety all over when young.
On the peaches topic, would be good to note down what species of tree they were growing on as the very few times I have spotted them its always been on elm which is what the books suggest is where they normally grow but some of the ispot records look to be on other species of tree which is interesting.
Thanks for the "thumbs up" Mike!
Lat/Lng: 52.21328, 0.18241
OS grid ref: TL492594