- Explore community
A couple of observations have turned up recently which I'm pretty sure aren't genuine, both from the same user.
This one has a photo from the wikipedia page for the same species: http://www.ispot.org.uk/node/225520 - and seeing as wikipedia says it was only discovered in 2003 it would be a surprising observation!
and this one has a photo from a travel website: http://www.ispot.org.uk/node/225532
I don't think this is what iSpot is intended for and could be a bit irritating if you spend time trying to identify observations like this. I quite like seeing foreign observations but only if they really have been seen!