No interactions present.
Is there a bird?! Really?! ;)
My Flickr photos...
Smidgen right of dead centre ---- but it took me ages to find it!!
No...still no joy!
Returning to opticians for a refund...clearly the glasses are faulty!
Thanks anyway, Ray.
There is a bird there, and it might possibly be a Snipe (though I'm not even sure that it's a wader!).
Stint sp. Little or Temminck's?
Sorry, John, but it is completely unreasonable of you to expect anyone to identify this (even as a bird - if you had not said there was a bird there, no-one would have guessed).
If you want IDs, your pictures will need to be a lot more informative. They do not have to be publication quality, but they must show the necessary detail, which this certainly does not. If you browse the site you will see what is needed for birds, fungi, insects, etc., as the details are different for each group.
recording wildlife with The Recorder's Year on www.hbrg.org.uk/TRY.html.
OK. You will all be pleased to learn that I have almost finished uploading scanned images from old prints. Hopefully, digital submissions will be, at least marginally, better!
In some cases it may be possible to supplement a poor photo with a written description to allow observers to come up with an identification using a combination of both the features that can be seen and those which are described. In this case though I don't think that the photograph shows anything at all that can be used to arrive at an identification - and if a written description had been posted, any identification would likely be based entirely on the details that contained.
If photos are poor, try and supplement them with any aditional details that you can remember.
Having consulted with my then companion, we have decided that this was an attempt to photograph a Temminck's Stint.
Your points are all noted and apreciated.
Lat/Lng: 39.2132, 26.2235