No interactions present.
Your statement of 'I'm as sure as I can be' seems to be contradicted by the notes! Perhaps you should have said 'It's likely to be...'?
For what it's worth, I think you are right, but not enough for me to agree.
My Flickr photos...
Ophrys it means exactly that.- I am as sure as I can be - I checked Stace looked at the Upper Bracts at full image res. If you think its something else please offer your ID. notes were added as a guide to the limitations of the image and for the benefit of others wanting to learn the plant. Your post seems to answer the question if you think its something else plesse feel free to ID it You can just about discern some mid/lower leaves which made me sure of the observation these were not imediately obvious and hence the guiding note Before actually posting I also compared my own Common and Greater Knapweed Imaging and concluded as posted
Whats Happening with Nature ??? Visit the Nature Blog
Supporting FEET Conservation work & Biodiversity Recording
That's fine...I think it was just the way you expressed it that made me wonder. 'would' suggested that you 'could' not! Flippin' subjunctives/conditionals or whatever they are! :)
No worries its all good stuff - Good to be Discerning : ) . Keep snapping
Lat/Lng: 51.4451, -2.6446
OS grid ref: ST552719