Lots of these all in one area today.
No interactions present.
Hardly a revision Johnathan, more a comment??
As a matter of fact your id was uploaded whilst I was writing mine so I was not aware of yours until after i had sent mine and assumed I was providing the first suggested ID.
However, in my view it is only possible to identify the moth in the photo with certainty to the genus level so I think it is appropriate in any case to have it as a suggested ID rather than a comment. Other iSpot users have the opportunity to provide their opinion on the matter by agreeing with one or other of us (or by proposing revisions of their own of course if they think we are both wrong!).
More a revision with justification - it's changed the ID from Aplocera efformata to Aplocera (which is as far as can be reliably stated from this photo, for the reasons Jonathon gives)
Record your ladybird sightings!
Thanks Jonathan and Rimo for clearing that up. I did post the ID as 'It's likely to be this, but I can't be certain.' For the exact same reasons that Jonathan posted (in which he is quite right)
There is a very clear comparison of the rear ends of the 2 species here:
Lat/Lng: 51.165, -1.4385
OS grid ref: SU393407